Tasar Sailing Boat - Boating and Marine Accessories

The Tasar is not merely a sailing dinghy; it is a statement of aerodynamic intent and hydrodynamic purity. Born from the drawing board of Frank Bethwaite in Sydney in 1975, this 14-foot (4.52 meters) fiberglass vessel represents a pivotal moment in the evolution of small-boat design. It was conceived to solve a specific problem that plagued the sailing world of the mid-20th century: how to deliver high-performance excitement without the physical brutality of the trapeze or the logistical complexity of the spinnaker. For the boat lover in the United States, accustomed to the sturdy ubiquity of the Vanguard 15 or the athletic demands of the 505, the Tasar offers a revelation. It is a “sailor’s boat”—a machine where finesse, trim, and an understanding of wind physics triumph over raw muscle.

At first glance, the Tasar cuts a distinctive silhouette. It lacks the cluttered foredeck of a spinnaker-equipped sloop, presenting instead a clean, purposeful prow that hints at its origins in the high-speed skiff development classes of Australia. The hull is exceptionally light, weighing in at a mere 68 kilograms (149 pounds), constructed from a stiff foam-sandwich composite that was revolutionary at the time of its debut and remains the gold standard for stiffness-to-weight ratios today. This lightness is paired with a hard-chined hull form—sharp angles at the transition between the bottom and sides—which allows the boat to break free from the water’s grip and plane not just downwind, but significantly, upwind.

The cockpit is designed for human ergonomics as much as for performance. Unlike the bruising, shallow cockpits of older British designs like the Enterprise or the Laser 2, the Tasar features a deep, “sit-in” layout with wide side tanks that are angled to support the thighs of the crew. This design choice is intentional, catering to the class’s target demographic: mixed crews, often couples or parent-child teams, who wish to race competitively without requiring the distinct physical advantage of two heavy male athletes. The absence of a trapeze means the crew hikes—leans out using toe straps—but the efficient hull shape ensures that a combined crew weight of roughly 140 kg (308 lbs) is sufficient to hold the boat flat in a breeze.

Above the deck, the Tasar is an engine of aerodynamic efficiency. It utilizes a rotating mast, a feature usually reserved for high-performance catamarans. This aluminum spar rotates to align with the airflow, smoothing the transition of wind onto the fully battened Mylar mainsail and eliminating the turbulence found behind conventional fixed masts. There is no spinnaker to wrestle; instead, the Tasar employs a whisker pole to hold the jib out wing-on-wing when running downwind. This configuration allows the boat to sail dead downwind angles that asymmetric skiffs cannot match, creating a tactical game of “deep” sailing that is unique to the class.

For the American audience, particularly those in the Pacific Northwest where the class has achieved a cult-like following, the Tasar is more than a one-design racer; it is a platform for lifelong sailing. It bridges the gap between the learn-to-sail simplicity of a Laser and the technical wizardry of a 49er. It is a boat that refuses to act its age, planing effortlessly past modern designs while carrying a crew of widely varying ages and physical types. To sail a Tasar is to engage in a conversation with the wind and water, mediated by a design that Frank Bethwaite spent a lifetime perfecting.

History

The genesis of the Tasar is deeply rooted in the specific sailing culture of Sydney Harbour and the unique professional background of its designer. Frank Bethwaite was not just a naval architect; he was a meteorologist, a pilot, and a scientist who approached sailing with the rigorous analytical mindset of an aeronautical engineer. In the 1960s and 70s, Australian sailing was undergoing a period of intense experimentation, particularly in the “skiff” classes where rules were loose, and speed was the only currency that mattered.

The Roots: NS14 and the Quest for Efficiency

Before the Tasar, there was the Northbridge Senior (NS14). The NS14 was a restricted development class in Australia—a “box rule” class that limited length and sail area but allowed designers freedom in hull shape and rig geometry. It was in this crucible that Bethwaite honed his theories on “high-performance displacement” sailing. The prevailing wisdom of the era favored U-shaped, heavy hulls that pushed water aside. Bethwaite, however, was obsessed with reducing drag. He developed the “Nova” series of NS14s, which featured flatter aft sections, sharper chines, and finer bows. These boats demonstrated that with enough lift and low enough weight, a dinghy could exceed its theoretical hull speed without the massive sail area required by a skiff.

The NS14 became a laboratory for Bethwaite’s family. His sons, Mark and Julian (who would later design the Olympic 49er), served as test pilots for these radical concepts. The family dominated the class, proving that scientific design could beat traditional boatbuilding intuition. The NS14s were fast, but they were essentially custom-built development boats, often made of plywood, and limited largely to Australian waters.

The Ian Bruce Connection and the “Nova”

In the early 1970s, the global dinghy market was being reshaped by the Laser. Designed by Bruce Kirby and industrialized by Ian Bruce of Performance Sailcraft in Montreal, the Laser had proven that a strict one-design, mass-produced fiberglass boat could conquer the world. Ian Bruce, a visionary industrialist, saw a gap in the market. He had the single-handed market cornered with the Laser, but he needed a double-handed equivalent—a “Laser for two.”

Bruce approached Bethwaite with a proposition: could he adapt his highly successful NS14 designs into a strict one-design product for the world market? The brief was challenging. The boat had to be car-toppable (lightweight), durable, simple enough for the average club sailor, but high-performance enough to excite the experts. It needed to appeal to couples, specifically targeting the husband-wife dynamic which was underserved by the physically demanding classes like the 470 or the Fireball.

Bethwaite accepted the challenge. He took the hull lines of his most successful NS14 evolution and refined them for fiberglass mass production. The prototype was initially named the “Nova,” paying homage to its development lineage. The Nova prototype was a revelation. It featured a rotating mast—a radical departure for a mainstream production dinghy—and a fully battened mainsail. The prototype was tested extensively in Australia and Canada.

From Nova to Tasar: The Birth of a Classic

The boat was officially launched as the “Tasar” in 1975. The name change was likely a marketing decision to give the boat a distinct identity separate from the Australian development class. The first production Tasar debuted at the Annapolis Boat Show in October 1975, introducing the North American market to Australian skiff concepts for the first time.

The reception was mixed but intriguing. Traditionalists were baffled by the lack of a spinnaker and the rotating mast. However, those who sailed it were immediately converted. The boat was fast—remarkably so. It could plane upwind in 15 knots of breeze, a feat that most “displacement” dinghies of the era could only dream of. It was dry, stable at speed, and rewarded technique over weight.

Global Expansion and the “Montreal” Era

Performance Sailcraft began manufacturing the Tasar in Montreal, Canada, for the North American market, while Bethwaite’s own companies handled production in Australia. This bifurcation led to the first major challenge in the class’s history. The prototype Nova had been built with Kevlar skins over a foam core to achieve the 68kg target weight with high impact resistance. However, for the production Tasar, cost constraints forced the Montreal factory to switch to standard fiberglass skins while attempting to maintain the same ultra-low weight.

The result was the infamous “thin skin” era of the Montreal-built Tasars (roughly 1976-1980). These boats were fast and stiff, but their outer skins were eggshell-thin. In the rough-and-tumble world of American dinghy parks, where dollies were rare and docks were rough, these hulls suffered. They dented easily, leading to the description that they looked like they had “survived a hailstorm.” While this did not affect their speed, it gave the early boats a reputation for fragility in North America that took years to overcome.

Despite this, the class grew. Fleets sprouted in Seattle, Vancouver, and eventually the UK and Japan. The Japanese fleet, in particular, embraced the Tasar enthusiastically, appreciating its suitability for smaller statures and mixed crews. By the mid-1980s, the Tasar had established itself as an international class with a dedicated following.

Modernization and Longevity

The Tasar has remained remarkably true to Bethwaite’s original 1975 vision, but it has not been stagnant. In 2006, the class voted to update the sail plan from the original Dacron to PET (Mylar) film sails. This was a crucial evolution. Dacron sails, while durable, stretched under load, distorting the precise aerodynamic shape Bethwaite had calculated. The new Mylar sails were clear, crisp, and dimensionally stable. They locked in the “engine’s” power, making the boat faster and more responsive, while also giving it a modern, high-tech aesthetic that appealed to a new generation.

Today, production has consolidated largely in Asia under the supervision of Bethwaite Design, ensuring a high level of consistency. The “thin skin” issues of the 1970s have been resolved with modern resin infusion techniques and strategic reinforcements approved in 2018. The Tasar stands today not as a vintage curiosity, but as a thriving, active class that continues to hold World Championships with fierce competition, proving the timelessness of Bethwaite’s scientific approach to speed.

Design

To understand the Tasar is to understand the physics of the “drag hump.” Frank Bethwaite’s design philosophy was centered on the concept that a boat’s speed is limited by the resistance it encounters as it moves through the water. For a displacement hull, this resistance increases exponentially as the boat approaches its “hull speed”—the speed at which the wavelength of the bow wave equals the waterline length of the boat. For a 14-foot boat, this is approximately 5 knots.

The Hydrodynamic Solution

Most dinghies of the 1970s (and many today) are trapped by this physics. To go faster than 5 knots upwind, they must force their way through the water, pushing a massive bow wave. This requires immense power, usually generated by large sails and a crew hanging off a trapeze.

Bethwaite took a different approach. He designed the Tasar hull to have an exceptionally low resistance curve in the “transition zone” between 5 and 7 knots.

Fine Entry: The bow sections of the Tasar are extremely fine (narrow). This allows the boat to slice through the water with minimal impact, reducing the energy lost to creating waves.
Flat Run Aft: The underbody of the hull transitions from a V-shape at the bow to a wide, flat surface at the stern. This provides the hydrodynamic lift necessary to raise the hull out of the water.
Hard Chines: The Tasar features sharp, distinct angles (chines) where the bottom meets the sides. In many round-bilged boats, water “sticks” to the curved hull as it rises, creating suction that holds the boat down. The Tasar’s sharp chines encourage the water to break clean away from the hull, reducing this suction and allowing the boat to release onto a plane.

This design results in the “Tasar Pop.” When the boat reaches approximately 7 to 8 knots of boat speed, it doesn’t just go faster; it undergoes a phase change. It pops up onto the surface of the water, and resistance suddenly drops. The boat accelerates freely, often reaching speeds of 10-12 knots upwind in a strong breeze—a sensation that feels like a turbocharger kicking in.

Table 1: Tasar Technical Specifications

Specification	Metric	Imperial	Notes
Length Overall (LOA)	4.52 m	14 ft 10 in	optimized for car-topping
Waterline Length (LWL)	4.27 m	14 ft 0 in	Long waterline for displacement speed
Beam	1.75 m	5 ft 9 in	Wide beam for hiking leverage
Hull Weight (Fully Rigged)	68 kg	149 lbs	Ultra-lightweight for 1975
Draft (Board Down)	1.05 m	3 ft 5 in	Deep high-aspect centerboard
Mainsail Area	8.36 m²	90 sq ft	Fully battened, high roach
Jib Area	3.07 m²	33 sq ft	High aspect ratio
Combined Sail Area	11.43 m²	123 sq ft	High power-to-weight ratio
Ideal Crew Weight	130-150 kg	286-330 lbs	Perfect for couples/mixed crews

Ergonomics and Layout

The deck layout of the Tasar is a direct reflection of its “human-centric” design. Bethwaite recognized that a comfortable crew is an efficient crew. If a sailor is in pain from a sharp gunwale or struggling to maintain footing, they cannot focus on the subtle art of steering and trim.

Side Tanks: The side decks (tanks) are wide and contoured. They are designed to match the angle of the human leg while hiking. This distributes the load across the thigh, reducing fatigue and allowing the crew to hike harder for longer periods.
Deep Cockpit: The floor of the cockpit is deep, lowering the crew’s center of gravity and providing a secure sensation, unlike the “sit-on-top” feel of a Laser.
Thwart: A transverse structural beam (thwart) provides hull stiffness and a bracing point for the crew in light air, but it is positioned to not interfere with movement during tacks.
Centerboard Case: The case is integrated into the hull structure, capping off at a height that allows for comfortable movement while maintaining the watertight integrity of the hull.

Stability Profile

The Tasar’s stability profile is biphasic.

Initial Stability: At rest or at low speeds, the boat can feel “tender” or tippy. The rounded bottom sections near the centerline offer little resistance to rolling. This forces the crew to be attentive and precise with their balance.
Secondary Stability: As the boat heels and speeds up, the wide, flat sections and the hard chines engage with the water. The stability increases dramatically. When sailing fast, the Tasar feels like it is on rails, locked in by the chine and the hydrodynamic pressure of the water against the planing surface. This characteristic makes the boat safe and controllable in high winds, provided the crew keeps it moving fast.

Propulsion

The engine of the Tasar is where Frank Bethwaite’s meteorological expertise shines brightest. He viewed the sails not just as cloth to catch the wind, but as airfoils that must function in a complex, turbulent fluid environment. The Tasar’s propulsion system is designed to manage the “boundary layer”—the thin layer of air that flows directly over the surface of the sail.

The Rotating Mast

The most distinctive feature of the Tasar’s propulsion is the rotating mast. In a conventional dinghy (like a Laser or Vanguard 15), the mast is a fixed round or oval tube. As the wind flows past a fixed mast, it separates, creating a bubble of turbulence on the leeward side (the back side) of the mainsail’s luff. This turbulence destroys the lift in the most critical part of the sail—the leading edge.

The Tasar mast rotates. By pivoting on its heel, the mast can be aligned with the boom and the apparent wind.

Aerodynamic Effect: The rotation presents a smooth, unified leading edge to the wind. The mast section blends seamlessly into the sail curve, maintaining “attached flow” (laminar flow) further aft along the sail.
Result: This dramatically increases the lift coefficient of the rig. It generates more power for the same sail area and reduces drag. This efficiency is what allows the Tasar to forgo a spinnaker and trapeze; the main engine is simply more efficient than its competitors.
Control: The rotation is controlled by a lever at the base of the mast (the “spanner”). In light air, the mast is over-rotated to induce a deep, powerful shape. In heavy air, the rotation is reduced to flatten the sail and depower.

The Fully Battened Mainsail

The Tasar mainsail features full-length battens from the leech (back edge) to the luff (front edge).

Roach: The battens support a large “roach”—the area of the sail that extends outward in a curve from the straight line between the head and clew. This puts more sail area high up where the wind is stronger.
Twist Control: One of the Tasar’s secret weapons is “twist.” In heavy air, the stiff battens allow the top of the sail to twist open, spilling excess wind while the bottom of the sail remains powered. This acts like a car’s suspension, absorbing the gusts. Because there is no trapeze to leverage against the heeling force, this automatic gust response is critical for survival and speed in high winds.
Material: The switch to Mylar (PET) sails in 2006 further enhanced this. Mylar has zero stretch. When a gust hits, the sail does not bag out and become deeper (which would increase drag and heeling); instead, it transfers the energy directly into forward acceleration.

Table 2: Sail Material Comparison

Feature	Original Dacron (Pre-2006)	Mylar / PET (Post-2006)	Impact on Sailing
Stretch	High stretch under load	Near zero stretch	Mylar translates gusts to speed better.
Visibility	Opaque (White)	Translucent/Clear	Better visibility of traffic and jib telltales.
Durability	High (resists flogging)	Medium (creasing issues)	Mylar requires careful handling (rolling).
Shape Holding	Degrades over time	Consistent shape	Mylar remains competitive longer.
Weight	Heavier	Lighter	Reduced weight aloft reduces pitching.

The Whisker Pole System

The Tasar eschews the spinnaker for a whisker pole. This is a rigid pole that connects the mast to the clew of the jib.

Wing-on-Wing: Downwind, the mainsail is let out to one side, and the jib is poled out to the opposite side. This captures the maximum projected area to the wind.
Efficiency: Because the jib is projected far to windward into clear air, it is highly efficient. The Tasar can sail “dead downwind” (180 degrees to the wind) faster than many boats can sail broad reaching.
Gybing Technique: Gybing a Tasar with a whisker pole is a choreographed dance.
1. Preparation: The skipper steers deep. The crew unclips the pole from the mast.
2. The Turn: As the boom crosses the boat, the crew pulls the jib across.
3. The New Set: The pole must be pushed out to the new windward side and clipped back onto the mast ring. The jib sheet is tensioned to lock the pole in place.
4. Flow Reversal: Uniquely, when the jib is poled out, the air flows from the leech to the luff. The telltales on the jib act in reverse, and the crew must trim based on this reversed flow.

Construction and Materials

The construction of the Tasar is a tale of innovation, compromise, and eventual refinement. The core technology is GRP Foam Sandwich. This method uses a core of rigid closed-cell foam (originally Klegecell, later various PVC foams) sandwiched between two thin layers of fiberglass.

The Sandwich Advantage

Stiffness: Think of an I-beam. The foam core separates the two fiberglass skins, just as the web of an I-beam separates the flanges. This creates immense structural stiffness. A stiff hull does not flex as it hits waves, meaning the energy of the wave impact is not absorbed by the hull bending, but is instead resisted, allowing the boat to punch through.
Weight: By using foam for bulk, the amount of heavy fiberglass and resin can be minimized. This allows the 14-foot Tasar to weigh only 68kg, while a solid-glass Laser (which is smaller) weighs nearly the same or more.
Buoyancy: The foam core is inherently buoyant. Even if the hull is punctured and flooded, the material itself floats.

The “Montreal” Legacy and Thin Skins

As noted in the history section, the early North American boats built in Montreal (1976-1980s) used extremely thin outer fiberglass skins to meet the strict weight limit without the expensive Kevlar of the prototypes.

The Issue: These boats are structurally sound but cosmetically fragile. A knee drop in the cockpit or a collision with a dock piling could easily puncture the thin outer skin or compress the foam core, leaving a dent.
Soft Spots: Over decades, the bond between the skin and the foam can fail, usually due to repeated flexing from hiking or trailing. This creates “soft spots”—areas where the deck feels spongy.
Repair: Fixing a soft spot involves injecting epoxy resin into the void or, in severe cases, cutting away the skin, replacing the crushed foam, and re-glassing. It is a rite of passage for owners of vintage Tasars.

Table 3: Builder Timeline and Characteristics

Era	Builder	Location	Characteristics	Issues to Watch
1975-1980s	Performance Sailcraft	Montreal, Canada	“Thin skin” boats, very light, stiff.	Dents easily, soft spots on decks.
1980s-1990s	Ghillies / Western	Western Canada	Generally robust, variable consistency.	Centerboard case leaks.
1990s-2000s	Bethwaite Design	Australia	Improved layup, “Double-bias” cloth.	Better durability, consistent weight.
2005-Present	XSP (Bethwaite)	Singapore/Asia	Vacuum infusion, high precision.	The gold standard. Very stiff.
2018+	XSP (New Spec)	Singapore/Asia	Reinforced gunwales and thwart.	Slightly heavier construction for longevity.

2018 Specification Changes

Recognizing the aging fleet and the need for durability, the World Tasar Class Association approved specification changes in 2018. These changes allowed for:

Additional Cloth: Extra layers of fiberglass on the side decks, carlins (cockpit edges), and thwarts.
Thinner Foam: To offset the weight of the extra glass, the foam core thickness in non-critical areas (topsides) was reduced from 8mm to 6mm.
Result: A boat that weighs the same (meeting the one-design rule) but is significantly more resistant to the daily abuse of hiking and racing.

Types and Comparisons

The Tasar inhabits a unique niche. It is a “hiking double-hander.” To place it in context for the USA boat lover, we must compare it to the boats commonly found in American yacht clubs.

Tasar vs. Vanguard 15 (V15)

The Vanguard 15 is the staple of American team racing and post-collegiate sailing.

Hull: The V15 is a heavier (91 kg), solid laminate or robust sandwich boat. It is built like a tank to survive college sailing programs. The Tasar is a precision instrument (68 kg).
Speed: The Tasar is significantly faster. In a breeze, a V15 will plane, but it pushes a lot of water. A Tasar will plane earlier and point higher. The US D-PN rating reflects this: Tasar (88.2) vs V15 (90.5). (Lower is faster).
Comfort: The V15 cockpit is shallow and self-bailing, but uncomfortable for hiking. The Tasar’s contoured tanks are luxurious by comparison.

Table 4: Tasar vs. Vanguard 15 Comparison

Feature	Tasar	Vanguard 15
Primary Use	Fleet Racing / Performance	Team Racing / Club Training
Hull Weight	68 kg (149 lbs)	91 kg (200 lbs)
Speed (D-PN)	88.2 (Faster)	90.5 (Slower)
Construction	Fragile Foam Sandwich	Robust GRP
Rig	Rotating Mast, Mylar Sails	Fixed Mast, Dacron Sails
Spinnaker	No	No
Price (Used)	$3,500 – $6,000	$2,000 – $4,500

Tasar vs. RS200

The RS200 is the British evolution of the Tasar concept, designed by Phil Morrison in 1995.

Philosophy: Both target couples and mixed crews.
Spinnaker: The defining difference. The RS200 uses an asymmetric spinnaker (gennaker). This makes the RS200 faster and more exciting on a broad reach, but adds complexity and line management. The Tasar is purer—just two sails.
Upwind: The Tasar, with its longer waterline (4.52m vs 4.00m) and rotating mast, is generally faster and higher pointing upwind.

Table 5: Tasar vs. RS200 Comparison

Feature	Tasar	RS200
Origin	Australia (1975)	UK (1995)
Length	4.52m	4.00m
Downwind	Whisker Pole (Tactical)	Asymmetric Spinnaker (Fast/Fun)
Upwind	Superior (Rotating Mast)	Good (Conventional Mast)
USA Availability	High (West Coast)	Low (Import only)

Tasar vs. Laser 2

The Laser 2 was Ian Bruce’s other double-handed project.

Trapeze: The Laser 2 has a trapeze. This changes the crew dynamic entirely. It requires athleticism and agility. The Tasar rewards hiking stamina and finesse.
Speed: Surprisingly, the Tasar is faster around a course than the Laser 2 (D-PN 92.8 vs 88.2). The efficiency of the Tasar hull outweighs the power of the Laser 2’s trapeze and spinnaker.

Table 6: Performance Handicap Comparison (US Sailing D-PN)

Boat Class	Configuration	D-PN (2021)	Relative Speed
Int. 505	Trapeze + Spinnaker	79.8	Very Fast
Tasar	Hiking + Whisker Pole	88.2	Fast
Vanguard 15	Hiking + No Spin	90.5	Medium
Laser (ILCA 7)	Singlehanded	91.1	Medium
Laser 2	Trapeze + Spinnaker	92.8	Slower
Club 420	Trapeze + Spinnaker	97.2	Slowest

Note: Lower D-PN indicates a faster boat. The Tasar is faster than many trapeze boats.

Sailing Technique: The Owner’s Manual

Sailing a Tasar is a nuanced art. It is not a boat you can simply muscle through the water. It requires a “gear-shifting” mentality.

Upwind Planing: The “Pop”

The Holy Grail of Tasar sailing is planing to windward. This usually becomes possible in 12-15 knots of wind.

The Setup: As a gust hits, do not simply hike harder and pinch (steer closer to the wind). This kills speed.
The Bear Away: Ease the mainsheet slightly and steer down 5-10 degrees abruptly. This powers up the rig.
The Flatten: Hike maximally to get the boat perfectly flat.
The Acceleration: You will feel the hull “release” and the hum of the centerboard change pitch. The spray will move aft from the bow to the shrouds.
The Mode: Once planing (doing 8+ knots), gently steer back up toward the wind, but keep the boat moving fast. You are now “skiff sailing”—using apparent wind speed to generate power.

The “Q-Tack” (Heavy Air)

Because the Tasar is light and has high windage, tacking in heavy air (20+ knots) can be perilous. If you tack too slowly, the windage stops the boat, and you get stuck in irons (head to wind), drifting backwards.

Technique: The “Q-Tack” involves bearing away slightly to build maximum speed before the tack, then turning the rudder aggressively to carry that momentum through the eye of the wind. The crew must move explosively across the boat to flatten it on the new tack immediately, or the boat will capsize to windward.

Downwind Angles

Light Air: Sail angles. Sail “hot” (higher than dead downwind) to keep the air attached to the sails. The whisker pole may not be effective here; better to let the jib flow naturally.
Medium Air: Wing-on-wing with the whisker pole. Aim for deep VMG (Velocity Made Good). Steering is critical to keep the spinnaker-less jib filled.
Heavy Air: The boat will plane downwind easily. The challenge is the nose-dive. The fine bow can bury itself in the wave ahead. The crew must sit aggressively aft, almost on the transom, to keep the bow up.

Table 7: Rig Settings by Wind Strength

Wind Speed	Mast Rotation	Cunningham	Vang	Traveler	Strategy
0-8 kts	Full / Over-rotate	Loose	Loose	Center	Power up, deep shapes.
8-15 kts	Medium	Moderate	Snug	Center/Up	Transition to planing. Hiking hard.
15-25 kts	Minimal (In-line)	Very Tight	Very Tight	Down	Flatten sail, open leech, survival mode.

The US Market and Community

While the Tasar is global, its US presence is highly concentrated. It is a “cult” boat in the best sense of the word.

The Pacific Northwest Stronghold

Seattle is the undisputed capital of North American Tasar sailing. The conditions in Puget Sound—deep water, moderate breeze, and a strong culture of technical sailing—align perfectly with the boat’s strengths. The Seattle Yacht Club and Corinthian Yacht Club host large fleets.

2022 World Championship: Held in Seattle, this event showcased the strength of the US fleet. American teams took 5 of the top 10 spots, proving that US sailors have mastered Bethwaite’s creation. The winners, Dalton and Lindsay Bergan (USA), demonstrated the boat’s suitability for mixed crews at the elite level.

Buying a Tasar in the USA

For a US buyer, finding a Tasar requires patience.

New Boats: Imported from XSP (Singapore) via dealers like West Coast Sailing. A new boat, fully race-ready with trailer and dolly, can cost upwards of $15,000 USD.
Used Market: This is where the action is.
- Price Range: A competitive used boat (post-2000) typically sells for $5,000 – $8,000. Older “Montreal” boats (1970s) can be found for $1,500 – $3,000 but often require restoration (soft spot repairs).
- What to Look For:
  1. Soft Spots: Walk (carefully) or press firmly on the foredeck and side tanks. Sponginess indicates delamination.
  2. Mast Step: Check for cracking around the base of the mast.
  3. Centerboard Case: Check for leaks where the case meets the hull.
  4. Sails: Mylar sails have a finite racing life. A boat with crisp, crinkly sails is worth significantly more than one with tired, milky sails.

Table 8: Used Tasar Value Guide (USA Market Estimates)

Vintage	Condition	Estimated Price	Best For
1976-1985	Needs Work	$1,000 – $2,000	DIY Enthusiasts, Cottage Sailing
1976-1985	Restored	$2,500 – $3,500	Club Racing Entry Level
1990-2005	Good	$4,000 – $6,500	Competitive Club Racing
2006-2015	Race Ready	$7,000 – $10,000	Regional Championships
2016+	Pristine	$12,000+	World Championships

Conclusion

The Tasar is a triumph of engineering over excess. In an era where sailing often equates speed with complexity—foils, wings, and carbon-fiber webs—the Tasar stands as a reminder that speed can also come from simplicity. Frank Bethwaite did not just design a boat; he designed a system. He stripped away the superfluous elements of the dinghy (the trapeze, the spinnaker, the heavy keel) and optimized what remained to the very limit of physics.

For the American boat lover, the Tasar offers a unique pathway. It is a boat that grows with you. It is forgiving enough to be a couple’s daysailer on a lake, yet technical enough to challenge Olympic-level sailors on the racecourse. It captures the essence of the Australian skiff revolution—the thrill of the plane, the spray in the face, the hum of the foil—and packages it in a form that fits on a trailer and can be sailed by anyone willing to learn the art of the wind. Nearly fifty years after its launch, the Tasar does not just endure; it accelerates.

Rate this post